THE CHEMISTRY OF CONTAMINANT DETECTION

7ca84eab-394c-4846-aa65-7af6f54d137e

Latest Posts
Industry Updates
Reducing downtime and machinery damage
19 January 2022
Industry Updates
Cawood acquires EMS
18 January 2022
News
40-year first for crop
18 January 2022
News
A nose for disease ...
17 January 2022
Industry Updates
Agricultural Society reappoints president
14 January 2022
04 May 2021
|
THE CHEMISTRY OF CONTAMINANT DETECTION

Relearning product characteristics when inspecting food applications is a common challenge for manufacturers. Density, water concentration, storage temperatures, heat, thawing and even seasonal and soil variations, are among the many factors that could affect the performance of food inspection machines. Phil Brown, European Managing Director of Fortress Technology and Sparc Systems explains the science and how smart technology can adapt to changing food characteristics.

 

Digital technologies have quickly transformed how we all run processes. Machine learning especially is pushing the innovation boundaries in food manufacturing and streamlining production processes. It is a science which requires a deep understanding of the chemical makeup and molecular structures of foods.

 

How fats, proteins, carbohydrates and sugars change during processing and storage will initiate a chemical reaction. To the naked eye, and even taste buds, these changes are barely noticeable. Yet, for wet and conductive foods, such as bread, meats, dairy products and ready meals, to a sensitive metal detector inspecting the same foods over an eight-hour shift, they can appear like completely different products.

 

Thermal changes and water content are the main factors that can interfere with metal detector signals. Dealing with higher amplitudes of product signal can be especially pronounced in meat processing plants inspecting varying weights and sizes of joints, some boneless and others boned.

 

Phil said: “With boneless joints there’s a greater concentration of meat, which means they are denser and consequently weigh more. This water content, which could be intensified by ‘plumping’ – a common practice to maintain tenderised meat products by injecting salt water or stock - disrupts and mimics the metal detector signal causing traditional systems to react as if there’s a metal contaminant present and reject the product.” 

 

Known as ‘product effect’, these false rejects more often than not result in perfectly good food being discarded.

 

The power of ARM

 

To identify a metal contaminant within conductive products, a metal detector must remove or reduce this ‘product effect’. The solution is to change the frequency of operation to minimise the effect of the product. But there’s a trade-off. Doing this can impact the ability to find different metals. Dropping the frequency tends to enhance ferrous metal detection. Yet this limits performance when it comes to non-ferrous metals, since the lower end of the frequency is more responsive to magnetic effects of the contamination. By the same token, the reverse happens when the frequency is taken higher – it starts to limit the ferrous detection capability but enhances the non-ferrous detection.

 

Simultaneous frequency is the most reliable way to remove product effect without compromising the sensitivity of a metal detector. Fortress uses ARM microprocessors to adapt to these changing product characteristics. This processing technology powers the Fortress Interceptor, enabling it to run real-time analysis of the low-frequency and a high-frequency signals in parallel.

Content continues after advertisements

 

By the same virtue, as products travel through processing facilities, environmental conditions change. Factory temperatures rise and dip. Alternatively, frozen food can thaw. A change of just 5°C is enough to affect the product characteristics and disrupt product signals.

 

 

Certain technologies can counteract changing food characteristics as they pass through the processing chain. For example, AutoPhase on metal detectors tracks long-term changes within wet products, adapting and syncing to new characteristics.

 

Phil said this can also help in packaging. Whereas inert plastic presents minimal signal, metallised films and the application of print can vary between rolls. “Just a small change can present itself as a big signal to a sensitive metal detector,” said Phil. Although once deemed a major challenge for metal detectors, today’s advanced simultaneous frequency systems are much more reliable inspecting pre-wrapped products.

 

For food packaged in cans, tins or foil, x-ray inspection systems can play a critical complementary role. “Often, a system like Sparc’s Apollo bridges the gap in inspection capabilities and ensures the most robust screening process for contaminants. If a product has been mispackaged, an x-ray can pick this up, ensuring absolute quality of the end product,” said Phil.

 

Cause and effect

 

The presence of xenobiotic compounds is routinely monitored and tightly controlled by regulatory bodies. However, farming practices, regional soil structures and natural crop cycles, although rare, can also influence the nutrient content of fresh produce. Inspecting potatoes grown, for example, in iron rich soils might require a slightly different calibration setting to those grown the other side of the country.

 

A metal detector that can run multiple frequencies simultaneously, such as the Fortress Interceptor, can inspect a variety of conductivities at the same time. Features like single pass product learning and automatic calibration also help, as operatives are not constantly resetting the machine to accommodate different product effect, shapes, sizes and orientation.  

  

Never underestimate the influence of environmental factors, advises Phil. “When it comes to food safety, there’s always a cause and a consequence. Having deep rooted experience about how different food products behave and change, the conditions that cause these reactions, and the relearning limits of inspection equipment is critical.”

 

Trap crops in starker focus
PGRO advises growers to get ready for pest monitoring
International project on weeds